Archive for the 'English Majors' Category

On Wuthering, Wuthering, Wuthering Heights

February 12, 2011

Oh hey there.

So since September I have been trying to read Wuthering Heights.

I find it to be the most tedious and, well, shit book ever.

I have started it so many times in my life and normally only get a chapter or two in before I throw it away and scream “FUCK YOU, EMILY BRONTE! GET A LIFE.”

There’s just something about it. It is written well enough, most of the characters are pretty well fleshed out and it has some really evocative descriptions. I just can’t stand the arrogance of it.

Every second sentence I just picture Emily Bronte writing and either chuckling to herself

“Ah ha ha! I am so brilliant and dark!”

Or, someone has just upset her in real life so she makes characters randomly beat each other up/die.

“NOBODY UNDERSTANDS ME. LIFE IS PAIN. TIME TO DIE, CATHY.”

It’s literally like, 19th Century fan fiction and she is the Mary Sue (see below post for definition) that is Nelly. Some servant bitch who somehow is all fantastic and everyone loves her and she gets away with the most ridiculous things BECAUSE SHE IS RIGHT IN THE LONG RUN.

So yeah, the book makes me pretty mad, BUT, I have found a way to make it fucking amazing. With the help of Kate Bush.

  1. Every time they say “Wuthering Heights” sing “WUTHERING, WUTHERING, WUTHERING HEIGHTS”
  2. Heathcliffe is always read as “HEEEAAAAATHCLIFFFFFFE” and you have to imagine the Kate Bush dance, especially the movement she does while singing his name that looks like “The Crane” from the Karate Kid
  3. Cathy/Catherine is always mentally read as a really high pitched squeaky Kate Bush singing voice
  4. Moor/s is always read as “wiley, windy, moors”
  5. Nelly is renamed to “woah, Nelly”.

Fuck yeah. Instant amazing novel.

Also I have this mug:

My friend, Demelza put it perfectly:

“You can’t pick Pride and Prejudice or an AMAZING novel because the other classics will get jealous. If you pick Wuthering Heights then they’ll understand that it’s a big joke and won’t be mad.”

Wuthering, Wuthering, Wuthering Heights

So fucking badass.

PS: I am now halfway through! I am so fucking butch it hurts.

On why you don’t fuck with Elizabeth Bennet

January 18, 2011

Greetings whatever readers I have left.

It sure has been a while.

A strange thing happened to me a few days ago and it inspired me to start writing again. A somewhat insignificant event that has cascaded through my attitude to everything. Like the monkeys in A Space Odyssey, something slowly dawned and then led me to some crazy murderous robot and the meaning of the universe.

I forgot what it is that I love to do because I was too caught up in making sure I didn’t die. I betrayed the Little Prince. I started counting the stars that I owned for the sole purpose of knowing how many belonged to me and how many more I could have.

Upon realising this I kept trying to force myself to write again. It never happened until now.

What I did do was read a blog by a successful, modern author who is rather controversial. I am not naming this author because I do not want to make this personal. I don’t want this to be “this woman is shit and her books are crap”. Instead I wanted to examine why I do not like books that I have never read and never intend to and why characters that I have never experienced irritate me.

When I completed reading this woman’s blog I could only think of one thing to say:

“Bitch, please!”

What this author had done was compare her characters to some literary giants and made hers out to be the better. I may not like all the characters she undercut but they are still good characters. Wuthering Height’s Heathcliffe is pretty fucking amazingly complex even if he is a jerk who only knows how to rage. Romeo is a fucking tool and Juliet started out so promising but then she stabs herself for no reason (sorry forgot the spoiler alert, hope I haven’t given it away to anybody). Even so, there’s something about their parts that give me goosebumps when they are done right. The characters are perfect.

Bitch even dared touch Elizabeth Bennet.

GIRL DID NOT GO THERE.

You do not fucking try to compare anything or anyone to the Elizabeth Bennet.

Remember how we all hate/hated Kiera Knightley so much for butchering the role? She didn’t. I am sure if I watch the movie again now I will actually like it. It’s because our standards were way too high to be upheld twice in 20 years and Jennifer Ehle already smashed her (and Colin Firth smashed Mr Darcy).

I love how I’m deflecting my opinion onto everyone.

Anyway. Enough about amazing characters. On to shit ones.

If people are unaware of what a Mary Stu is, in general terms, it’s a character that’s  essentially a projection of the author’s self twisted into their dreams (an anti-sue is an amalgamation of their fears).

The characters will typically be described as well liked except by people who are obvious antagonists (and who are usually jealous) and they always seem to end up being right. They have no flaws, or their flaws are endearing or beneficial

For example:

Being clumsy (flaw).

Being clumsy at times when it’s hilarious because “oh that character’s always SO CLUMSY LOL” – endearing (no longer a real flaw)

Being stubborn (flaw).

Always being right so being stubborn means that even when it’s annoying, it is OK because you end up being right and everyone loves you and your stubborn nature (no longer a real flaw).

In the shall-remain-nameless work mentioned above, the main character is a typical Mary Sue.

If one of the character’s flaws is “she’s unattractive” she should not be named something that basically (both literally and evocatively) means “beautiful woman”.

If one of the character’s flaws is “they are clingy and love too much” they should not be given a relationship early on with another character who’s flaws are “I am too beautiful and it’s a curse and I am clingy and love too much”.

What the fuck even is that?

Where is there even room for character growth?

Having a modern day woman pine after her man and want to kill herself if something would happen to him is not a good image to portray. Not even Catherine was that fucking idiotic, especially not considering the period setting of Wuthering Heights.

Modern books that I may not necessarily have liked, such as the end few novels in the Harry Potter series, still have amazing, strong characters that have a sense of purpose (although some of the newer or minor ones became a bit stagnant they were still all pretty good).

The best example would be young Hermione in Harry Potter. She’s about 17 when the boy she loves leaves and she doesn’t mope around or kill herself. She simply says “oh this is shit but there’s more important things to worry about here”.

I guess the whole misogynist Mary Sue shit is my main issue, not having read the terrible literature in question. I can’t really comment further because of this but I have one final thing to say in the hopes that people who read this idiot’s blog will now learn something.

Sense and Sensibility was not about Marianne Dashwood ending up with Willoughby. If this upsets you please re-read the novel.

Wuthering Heights was not just about Heathcliffe and Cathy being together (or how “evil” Heathcliffe is). I’m trying to grasp this and the novel now and it is hard but I will get there.

Romeo and Juliet is not about the two of them ending up together, or even being “in love”. It’s actually about the fleetingness of life and the pointlessness of love. Please see a theatre production next time it rolls into your town. Even an art house one would work because it would make the themes are lot more obvious and depressing.

Pride and Prejudice is certainly not just about Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy ending up together, even though they do. The ending is probably my least favourite part. You HAVE to read her rejection of Mr Colins. So fucking incredible.

So to try to destroy classic literature, liked or not, by saying “my characters are better because they would kill themselves if the other died” is not a healthy thing to say and certainly not a healthy theme to have circulating to young adults.

This is why when people tell me what books they like and a certain series crops up, I judge them. It’s because they not only helped contribute to the death of modern, young adult literature (especially the sci-fi and fantasy genres) which has been amazing for so long, they have contributed to a poison which is now starting to have repercussions in our classic literary past. That is a fucking shame.

Literary fucked.

April 27, 2010

Hey everyone! What’s going on?

So, as you may remember from me mentioning it about 446d5 times, I am an English Major. WELL actually an “English and Creative Arts” slash Asian Studies (Anthropology) Major, BUT I DISPLAY THE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ENGLISH MAJOR.

“What ARE these characteristics?”, you ask.

Well, that sounds like a good idea for a blog!

The first characteristic of an English Major is what I call “writer disease”. English majors like writing. They can go on and on and on about anything and everything as long as they are writing about it. We can tell you all about history, culture, writers, themes, media, styles, cliches, tropes, languages, EVERYTHING. This is because our degrees give us so many electives and choices, that, even with a double major/degree, we can learn about so many amazing things just by doing core units. However, we can only tell you about these things through references in our writing, or by toiling over words for hours. This is because we are not experts at any given thing. Our brains are basically wikipedia, but they are wikipedia if wikipedia was actually a set of encyclopedias that weren’t really ordered very well but still had a billion links to various tangents. This is evident in my comment on the ANZAC Day post. That took me all fucking morning to write and I knew exactly what I wanted to say. I just needed to consult my brain.

David: “Oh hey brain! Can you tell me all about the stolen generation?”

David’s Brain: “FUCK YOU FEED ME COFFEE GET A JOB FIND A HOUSE TALK TO YOUR SISTER”

2 hours later…

OK SO STOLEN GENERATION…

40 minutes later

AND THAT’S WHY AUSTRALIA IS FUCKED. ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT THE ONLY COUNTRY STAINED BY RACISM…

40 more minutes later

AND THAT’S WHY THE SOUTHERN US DEMOCRATS WERE RACIST FUCKS WHO MURDERED BLACK PEOPLE. RACISM DIDN’T STOP WITH BLACK PEOPLE, HOWEVER…

40 more minutes later again

WHICH IS WHY JAPAN WAS ALL “WWII, BITCHES”… NOW LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT THIS BATTLE…

.etc

So yeah, it LOOKS like I know about all these things, and deep down in my brain somewhere, I do, very well. There’s just too much other shit swimming around for it to surface as soon as it is needed.

Also I am a rabid, binge drinking, alcoholic Australian. This slows the process down quite a lot…

What happens is, once we get into a certain context, or train of thought, we are on so much fucking fire that it actually means we don’t need to eat for days. We can write and write and write until even the most devoted reader will get sick of our constant stream of shit contextual facts. It just takes time to get the engine powered up.

So we’ve got “writer’s disease”, the next characteristic is the dreaded “being offended by everything” which is because of something I call a “context cocktail”. It is related to, and a leading cause of “writer’s disease”

Once English Majors actually get down to “Englishing” (VERY DECEPTIVE TERM AS IT ACTUALLY USUALLY MEANS “LITERATURE” IN GENERAL, THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT IN REGARDS TO CONTEXT COCKTAILS), we read lots. We read so much that we lose track of entire weeks. Last night I actually had a dream that I was reading a novel. It was actually Sense and Sensibility (By Jane Austen, obviously, if you didn’t know that I am judging you). I was actually reading Sense and Sensibility in my mind and it actually was just my subconscious, displaying page after page of the novel, and I was actually reading it. THAT IS HOW MUCH WE READ, PEOPLE.

HOWEVER, most of this reading isn’t actually the novel that we are currently devouring. That pleasure is a reward for spending a long time reading ABOUT the novel. We want to know everything about the context of the novel so that, when we read it a second time (obviously we read it first to digest it with our OWN, CURRENT, context), we are in a position to further understand the story and the writer and the characters and the setting. This means that we learn to see the world from EVERYONE’S point of view and realise that EVERYONE is fucked and EVERYONE is wrong and EVERYTHING is offensive. An example: For my dissertation, I wrote about nobel prize winning literature from China, Austria, Japan and England (prizes if you can name the Authors!! Writers, you may need a few hours for your brain to try to remember these things) and how important contextual information was in regard to these pieces AND how translating them to English would destroy some of the original meaning and the beauty of the language, but then create others. This means that I read a lot, and a lot more, and then some more about Austria and China and Japan and not England because I am half English and was using that as an example of “my own context”, so I didn’t want to usurp that by adopting Doris Lessing’s context (oops! I ruined the guess who game, sorry!). This meant that I got angry (for the 42957th time) at the USSR, I felt sorry for the billions of Japanese people who have constantly been raped of their national identity and realised that the history and cultural spirit of China is so vast that I could never possibly hope to grasp very much of it at all. SO NOW I GET OFFENDED WHEN PEOPLE ARE DICKS TO: CHINA, RELIGIONS, JAPAN, THE JAPANESE IDENTITY, CULTS, AUSTRIA, POOR PEOPLE, POLICE, SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS, THE WRONGLY ACCUSED, OLD PEOPLE, AND ETHNIC GROUPS IN ENGLAND, just from reading/writing about 4 books. I have been doing this extensively (aka for study) since Year 11 (I am not counting year 10 level as advanced enough, or this would be even longer). So six years. With about 12 “texts” in High School and at least about 50 through Uni. The above list was, on average, three points of being offended per text. That is at least 192 things that offend me, JUST FROM READING. These are serious and generalised things, too. If you broke say “RELIGIONS” down, you’d get “Being offended because religions are dicks”, “being offended because people don’t respect others’ beliefs”, “being offended because people don’t TRY to understand others’ beliefs” .etc

THEN THERE IS MY OWN CONTEXT, EVERYONE. I am offended by a lot of things because of my own context. This can vary from “being offended when people write “lyk dis bcuz dey tink its kool u guyz your just an h8rs [sic].”" To “being offended because there were only about 4 women in total who were performers during the entire soundwave festival”.

The next characteristic is what I like to call “not having a job because the university can only hire so many people before it gets ridiculous and to actually work in a bookstore or something you need to be really really really lucky, especially in Melbourne when there are 4w957349 74235 arty people without jobs”.

WHY DON’T WE HAVE JOBS, EVERYONE? It is simple. We basically have a sheet of paper that says

“Oh hey, I know a lot about a lot of things but none of that really relates to the real world because I live in a bubble where everything is OK because I understand everyone’s point of view and think that everyone does as well but actually the real world (slash this organisation) is actually fucked and full of discrimination and this degree is basically a warning siren that I’m probably actually going to complain about all the fucked-upness that you’re hoping people won’t bring up and you’ll have to put up with me doing this when you could just hire a business graduate who will just do the job without asking questions because they just want billions of dollars. Besides, reading is more of a hobby, anyway, there are a lot of people who studied “real” degrees who read quite a bit, like my sister or my friend, Matt. Here are their numbers, they would be better at this job, anyway.”

“with Honours.”

“PS: Ignore the fact that I can write/type a billion words per minute and that I can basically learn anything really quickly and that I was smart enough to get High Distinctions at University because everyone knows that English Majors don’t ever do any work ever, obviously that’s how they got this piece of paper.”

WHICH LEADS TO “BITTERNESS”, THE FINAL CHARACTERISTIC OF AN ENGLISH MAJOR.

We. Hate. The. World. We spend hours and hours (usually all at once, the few weeks before the end of semester) working and sculpting words and just generally being fucking amazing and debating and having discussions and talking about every topic under the sun. This is because we are at University because we want to be scholars. We are intelligent and driven and have something that no amount of money could ever buy. We don’t have a price and so we don’t improve the economy, and people with money don’t want to pay up to be told how fucked they are and how uneducated they are and therefore we carry the stigma of being “useless” and “lazy”.

COULD YOU FEEL THE BITTERNESS DRIPPING FROM THAT PARAGRAPH? SEE!

You know what. My last semester at Uni, I watched a billion TV shows, barely went to class and wrote all my assignments at the last minute. Not because I was particularly lazy. Just because I knew there was no necessity, no logic, to work my hardest when I knew I could get amazing marks with the effort that I gave (PS: I did). Plus also I spent most of my nights living in a theatre actually trying to work and was always too tired to put up with stupid people at Uni. Still, even I joke about how I did nothing for my degree and how “easy” English Majors are. Even so, I am pretty sure I wouldn’t trade having these characteristics for anything. So fuck off.

EDIT: OH MY FUCKING GOD (my god is Emily Deschanel, btw) YOU GUYS. I FORGOT THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BEING AN ENGLISH MAJOR:
BEING OBSESSED WITH THINGS.

We can very easily/already are obsessed with:

  • Characters in books/movies/TV shows (like Emily Deschanel’s portrayal of Dr Temperance Brennan)
  • Smart people
  • Coffee
  • Books
  • Writing
  • Conversations
  • Tank Girl
  • Being offended by things
  • Learning about everything
  • Being arty
  • Ourselves
  • America’s Next Top Model/Tyra Banks *snap snap snap*
  • Thinking we are better than everyone else
  • Sexuality

Just to name a few.

I have not yet discovered WHY it is that we collectively become obsessed with things. All I know is we cannot simply “like” something, or “like to hate” something. We obsessively love and/or love to hate EVERYTHING.

PS: Tune in tomorrow for “How To Be A Pretentious Artist #002″. I think this post changed from being funny/a joke to being serious, OH SNAP I’M SORRY, EVERYONE. A perfect example of “writer’s disease” because I got all fired up and went on and on and on for like, an hour.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers